Talk:Dreaming Tree Wines

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wine, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.WineWikipedia:WikiProject WineTemplate:WikiProject WineWine articles

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability[edit]

I am not sure the inherent notability of a wine associated with a rock performer, and not sure that the 2 blog links and the 1 Food and Wine article provide 'multiple non-trivial mentions in reliable sources'. Are there any other food products associated with 'famous people' that have a similar level of trivial mention that have their own articles (this is a genuine question, not rhetorical)? I want to thank Gaijin42 for finding those references, but at the moment I think this would be better served either as a small section on Dave Matthews or just a bare redirect. Syrthiss (talk) 17:26, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly WP:NOTINHERIT. Food & Wine is a major food magazine though. Is your argument that the article is really about Dave Mathews? Certainly I would stipulate that it is probably easier for him to get press on pet projects of his, but The articles linked are purely about the product/company. A difficult question indeed - to what degree do we "subtract" notability, if we believe the notability is "inherited" as far as the sources are concerned. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:30, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the Food and Wine article mentioned 'Dave Matthews' 8 times, and 'Dreaming Tree' never. Syrthiss (talk) 17:32, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How many mentions in an apple article of jobs vs apple? In any case, as long as the article isnt getting deleted, I won't object to the template sticking around for a while. We can let others weigh in on the long term viability of the article. I just thought it def didnt qualify for csd.Gaijin42 (talk) 17:39, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]