Talk:Ed Gallagher (American football, born 1957)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 28 July 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved as follows:

This appears to be the consensus from the discussions below.  — Amakuru (talk) 20:12, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



– Both of these players had a WP:COMMONNAME of "Ed Gallagher," both played American football, and both were Tackles. I can see three different ways to disambiguate these guys, so I'd like more input as to which one is "best." 1. Using year of birth to distinguish (which I dislike since no one would know their birthyear, but it's probably the cleanest). 2. One of the Ed Gallaghers seems to be more notable for his off the field work, so we could use author/motivational speaker/activist as his disambiguator and hatnote to the other one, who would use "American football" since he is soley known as a football player. 3. One of them was both an offensive tackle and defensive tackle, while the other one was solely an offensive tackle. We could use that difference to distinguish (eg: offensive lineman or offensive tackle vs. tackle). Thoughts? -- Tavix (talk) 16:18, 28 July 2016 (UTC) --Relisting for lack of participation — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 02:22, 11 August 2016 (UTC) --Relisting because there's nearly a consensus, but it's not quite there yet. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:30, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambiguate by year of birth. It's the least ambiguous of the above suggestions, particuarly as the two men are separated by about 50 years or so. PC78 (talk) 17:57, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Forget that. If the latter is fine at the current title (there are no other Edward B. Gallaghers), I suggest natural disambiguation for the former, i.e. Edwin B. Gallagher. [1] Let the dab page do the rest. PC78 (talk) 18:10, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose for now. Edward B. Gallagher is not known as Ed Gallagher and no source has been provided to establish that. (comment stricken by CookieMonster755 due to falsified statements against this move request) Right now, it is at natural disambiguation and the American footballer is at Ed Gallagher (American football) because there are other people who go by Ed Gallagher. If you are afraid that these two people will be confused, a hatnote should solve the problem. Ḉɱ̍ 2nd anniv. 17:41, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@CookieMonster755: Did you even look at the sources? All of them call him Ed Gallagher so your statement doesn't match the facts. Here they are for you in case you haven't actually looked yet: [2] [3] [4]. -- Tavix (talk) 17:47, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Tavix:, thanks for the links. However, my position still stands. Let's be WP:NATURAL and add a hatnote. Ḉɱ̍ 2nd anniv. 17:49, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@CookieMonster755: At the very least, you should strike your false statement: Edward B. Gallagher is not known as Ed Gallagher and no source has been provided to establish that is not true. -- Tavix (talk) 17:50, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Tavix:  Done Ḉɱ̍ 2nd anniv. 17:53, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@CookieMonster755: WP:NATURAL doesn't follow your argument here. It says: Using an alternative name that the subject is also commonly called in English reliable sources, albeit not as commonly as the preferred-but-ambiguous title. So for us to use this name, we would still need evidence that he is commonly called "Edward B. Gallagher" in sources. Could you provide evidence of this for me? -- Tavix (talk) 17:55, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral see [5] & [6]. Ḉɱ̍ 2nd anniv. 17:58, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Both of those links are known mirrors of the article here. Kuru (talk) 18:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support my above suggestion to move the former to Edwin B. Gallagher and keep the other as-is, because I think this is the cleanest solution, otherwise disambiguate by year of birth as this is the least confusing of the proposed disambiguators. PC78 (talk) 10:51, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be fine with year of birth. -- Tavix (talk) 22:27, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate both by year of birth which is the standard Wikipedia practice in such cases. They were born 55 years apart, thus eliminating any confusion as to their era of notability. It is rare that a sports figure would be known to the public or referenced in sports pages by such ceremonious forms as "Edward B." or "Edwin B." All three sports reference sites appended to Edward B.'s entry (NFL.com, Pro-Football-Reference and Databasefootball.com) confirm that the commonly used form of his name was "Ed". Likewise for sports references concerning Edwin B. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 17:31, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ed Gallagher (American football, born 1957). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:31, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]