Talk:Effects of Hurricane Floyd in New York

Effects of Hurricane Floyd in New York has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 22, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

New York (state): Long Island Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Long Island, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Todo:[edit]

The article is at least a "C". I don't have time to look at the "B" Class criteria right now but I will soon if no one else does in the mean time. --Dil Hoom Hoom Kare 22:36, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for GA in any case. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:09, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Effects of Hurricane Floyd in New York/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ham tech person 03:15, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will review in my free time. Ham tech person 03:15, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Look forward to receiving any suggestions. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 12:31, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Against Criteria[edit]

1. Pass

A) Prose is fine. Ham tech person 13:05, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

B) Well compliant with MoS guidelines Ham tech person 13:05, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2. Failed 2B

A) Includes a references section. Pass Ham tech person 13:05, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

B) Please source the statistics in the intro. all statistics must be sourced. Thus FAIL Ham tech person 03:07, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, lead material doesn't have to be sourced as per WP:LEAD^[1]; all meaningful information is already sourced in the main article. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:14, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, per WP:GA?, all statistics must be sourced.^[2] Also, statistics can be challenged, and WP:LEAD says that material that is likely to be challenged should be sourced. It also does not state that the may not be citations in the lead.^[1]Ham tech person 14:34, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and indeed all statistics are sourced. Lead sourcing is optional. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll call for a second opinion. Ham tech person 21:18, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SECOND OPINION: In my opinion, Julian is correct. As long as the statistics are cited in the body, there's no need to repeat them in the lead per WP:LEAD. I'd recommend

passing this article for GA, but I'll leave the final decision to you. –Grondemar 21:34, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Passed (with some WP:GA? related doubts) Ham tech person 02:05, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

C) WP:NOR Compliant.^[3] Pass

3. Pass

A) Way to stay focused on the main points. Pass Ham tech person 13:05, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

B) No unnecessary detail. Pass. Ham tech person 13:05, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

4. This article is more neutral than a pH 7 substance. Pass. Ham tech person 03:11, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

5. Pass. Quite stable in fact. Ham tech person 03:11, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

6. Pass

A) licensing is fine. Ham tech person 13:05, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

B) Images are quite well kaptioned. Ham tech person 13:05, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Policy Cited[edit]

Comments by Other Users[edit]

Third Opinion

I'd also advise passing this. Information in the lead does not need references, as long it is cited later on in the article. See these featured articles with uncited statistics in their leads:

There are many others. I'd say if featured articles can get away with it, good articles definitely can. Torchiest (talk | contribs) 01:11, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Effects of Hurricane Floyd in New York. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:25, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Effects of Hurricane Floyd in New York. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071217070417/http://www.nyc.gov/html/oem/html/hazards/storms_hurricanehistory.shtml to http://www.nyc.gov/html/oem/html/hazards/storms_hurricanehistory.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tropical cyclones which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:03, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[LEAD-1] WP:LEAD

[CRITERIA-2] WP:GA?

[NOR-3] WP:NOR

[1]

[2]

[3]