User talk:Juliancolton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Archive
Juliancolton's archives

---–

March 2008 Archive · April 2008 Archive · May 2008 Archive · June 2008 Archive · July 2008 Archive · August 2008 Archive · September 2008 Archive · October 2008 Archive · November 2008 Archive · December 2008 Archive · January 2009 Archive · February 2009 Archive · March 2009 Archive · April 2009 Archive · May 2009 Archive · June 2009 Archive · July 2009 Archive · August 2009 Archive · September 2009 Archive · October 2009 Archive · November 2009 Archive · December 2009 Archive · January 2010 Archive · February 2010 Archive · March 2010 Archive · April 2010 Archive · May 2010 Archive · June 2010 Archive · July 2010 – January 2011 Archive · February 2011 Archive · March 2011 – March 2012 Archive · March 2012 – March 13 Archive · March 2013 – early 2014 · Current

The Signpost: 05 November 2014[edit]

You...[edit]

...never provided a legitimate counter-argument to what I have said or contributed anything to the discussion, and aren't really in a position anyway to be bold-merging like that. Wikipedia is a consensus, not a vote, so it is extremely unfair for me when I see people completely ignoring what I have said, my arguments, my alternative proposal, everything. Goodbye. Dustin (talk) 04:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 November 2014[edit]

GAN help[edit]

Hi. You are one of two editors I found on the GA mentor list that I am asking this question. I am currently reviewing my fourth GA nomination, however, I have never reviewed or nominated an article anywhere near this small before: Lum You. See my review in progress at Talk:Lum You/GA1. I'm needing the opinion of someone who is more experience than I am; I understand as per GA guidelines that size alone is not criteria for failing a GA, though i'm not sure if this article is broad enough to be a GA. On coverage alone, could this potentially be a GA, or is it not detailed enough? Don't worry about any of the other issues, I don't want to take up any more of your time that I have to, and this is the only issue I am unsure about. Thanks for your time. Freikorp (talk) 12:18, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIV, November 2014[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 November 2014[edit]