Talk:Fagin the Jew

Comics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I added a wikilink to 2003 for the book publishing, because I felt it was useful. 205.210.232.62 (talk · contribs) removed it, because he did not feel it was useful. Anyone else has an opinion? I like it, but would not want to get into an edit war with that user. Thanks MosheZadka 12:07, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is my view that links to years that are not part of full dates are almost never useful, and I routinely remove them. At Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Date formatting it says:

"If the date doesn't contain a day and a month, then date preferences won't work, and square brackets won't respond to your readers' auto-formatting preferences. So unless there is a special relevance of the date link, there's no need to link it. This is an important point: simple years, decades and centuries should only be linked if there's a strong reason for doing so. See Wikipedia:Make_only_links_relevant_to_the_context for the reasons that it's usually undesirable to insert low-value chronological links; see also Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links)#Internal links."

I agree with this position. That is why I removed the link. (By the way 205.210.232.62 is an IP address that I often wind up with when i am logged out by mistake.) If others here strongly feeel that the year link should remain, so be it. I also don't want to get into an edit war. DES ^(talk) 15:11, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Historical Revisionism?"[edit]

Why is this article linked to the article on historical revisionism? Oliver Twist fiction, not history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluemonkee (talk • contribs) 05:53, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fagin the Jew. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5xJGaIOtG?url=http://www.willeisner.com/ to http://www.willeisner.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]