Talk:Famine response

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.
Discussion when this was an article on the body's starvation response

resources for continuing this article[edit]

Lantoka 08:29, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is missing quite a bit of information. However, I as a pre-med student do not feel qualified to edit it. ChaosEmerald

40-50 days?[edit]

"Thus, after about 40 to 50 days of starvation, the loss of body protein affects the function of important organs, and death results, even if there are still fat reserves left unused. (In a leaner person, the fat reserves are depleted earlier, the protein depletion occurs sooner, and therefore death occurs sooner.)"

I've been fasting since June 25, or 36 days, and feel fine. It's hard to imagine I've only got 4-14 days to live! (I'm 5' 7" and weighed about 170 pounds when I started. About a week ago, I weighed 140, and I suspect I weigh about 135 now. Since I started, I've taken only water, salt, three or four multivitamin tablets, and a few non-caloric foods, such as curry powder, tea, coffee, diet sodas, raw garlic, mustard, etc. -- except for four "indiscretions": two small cans of kippered herring, two cans of ravioli during the second week, and occasionally small amounts of non-dairy creamer in my tea and coffee.) So far, my health has improved greatly. I've gotten over a ten-year case of chronic dermatitis, various digestive problems have gone away, and mentally, I feel content, calm, and clear-headed. I realize that my experience is anecdotal, but 40-50 days still seems rather brief to me. I remember reading somewhere that people have gone for six months without food. D021317c 10:08, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

mitochondria[edit]

The consumption of ketone bodies by the brain relieves some of the glucose requirement but does not abolish it altogether. The brain retains some need for glucose, because ketone bodies can be broken down for energy only in the mitochondria, and mitochondria are often too big to travel down the long thin processes of neurons to reach the synapses.

Mitochondria moving within the cell to provide fuel? Sounds pretty bogus to me.

Inconsistent data across wikipedia[edit]

"after fasting for 3 days, the brain gets 30% of its energy from ketone bodies. After 4 days, this goes up to 70%." - from this page. but on the ketone bodies page, it says this: "After the diet has been changed to lower blood glucose for 3 days, the brain gets 30% of its energy from ketone bodies. After about 40 days, this goes up to 70%" on this page it says it goes up to 70% after 4 days, on the ketone bodies page, it says it takes 40 days. big difference.

Original research[edit]

This entire article reeks of original research. Not a single citation, but very specific claims about human metabolism. FironDraak (talk) 10:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MERGE this article into Starvation mode[edit]

I concur that "Famine response" should be merged with Starvation mode. They are about the same subject. Starvation mode is the better title as with "Famine response" many unrelated items come up in searches. 220.101 talk\Contribs 08:21, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree 87.194.220.146 (talk) 15:53, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]