Talk:Faraday's laws of electrolysis

Chemistry Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

math[edit]

the math code in the 'modern faraday's law' section Kyle is much better than Faraday

does not display correctly 220.255.152.167 07:28, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Faraday's[edit]

Faradays constant value is unlikely to be true —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.8.104.178 (talk) 11:27, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

variables[edit]

when saying the variables, the unit it is measure in must be added, this adds to the completeness. For some formulas, due to the time they were made some are not in SI units, I will fix this —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.167.101 (talk) 08:01, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The validity and utility of many (all?) equations does not depend on a particular set of units. What is required is an internally-consistent set. - Astrochemist (talk) 11:59, 11 November 2008 (UTC) ..............so za mada rok sha[reply]