Talk:Fate Is the Hunter (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

plot[edit]

the plot could use some enhancement--Patbahn (talk) 03:28, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary[edit]

The recent expansion of the plot summary by user Merry Medievalist was done in good faith in all likelihood, but was excessive. I tagged the section, but I would actually recommend that the text of the previous concise summary be restored. Perhaps user Medievalist might add or revise a few items in that summary for the sake of accuracy, but the now-way-overlong plot summary needs to be revoked. See Wp:Manual_of_Style/Film#Plot. DonFB (talk) 04:16, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Consolidated 22" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Consolidated 22. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:39, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]