A fact from Fernandina's flicker appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 December 2007, and was viewed approximately 1,820 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Fernandina's flicker is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cuba, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cuba related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CubaWikipedia:WikiProject CubaTemplate:WikiProject CubaCuba articles
Although the word links to Endemism, and seems to be the appropriate naturalist/biologist term, in the majority of cases in the English language, the word "endemic" is a term used as a medical term to refer to diseases. Similar to "pandemic." When I first read the line, I was expecting to read that the woodpecker caused problems through overpopulation. I plan on replacing the word with "native" which is better because its simplier, more direct and more appropriate. Cuvtixo (talk) 16:32, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but "native" does not mean the same thing as "endemic"! Native means a bird is natural there: i.e. that it hasn't been introduced. Endemic means that it's found there and only there. Two very different concepts. The word is wiki-linked, and I'm happy to include the biological definition in the sentence if that makes it clearer for you and others, but replacing it with "native" is not a good solution! MeegsC | Talk16:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
