Talk:Fisher & Paykel

This article was nominated for deletion on October 1, 2005. The result of the discussion was Keep.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

New Zealand High‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Healthcare[edit]

I have taken out the information about fisher & paykel healthcare as this is an entirely separate company, the best solution would be a seperate article for it, a disambiguation page here and the content currently here to be moved to Fisher & Paykel Appliances or similar.--Grilpol 15:24, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-impartial article[edit]

This article seems to have been gone over by someone with an axe to grind - nearly every section contains multiple references to the company's apparent lack of innovation and business acumen. The history of the company also seems to have been completely removed. Ganymede 901 (talk) 15:50, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this article really desperately needs to be updated and in addition its poor reviews were back in 2010. That is 9 years ago. It should be more current to be fair on its modern performance. Alot of their appliances get editor choice awards on appliancesonline.com nowadays so things have changed.

120.17.145.156 (talk) 10:53, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fisher & Paykel Logo[edit]

The logo on this page is out of date. Please remove and replace with this logo: http://www.fisherpaykel.com/common/image/print-logo.gif — Preceding unsigned comment added by FisherPaykel (talk • contribs) 21:42, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fisher & Paykel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:03, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]