Talk:Frank Sinatra Sings for Only the Lonely/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I am reviewing your article for GA. Below is my evaluation. Please feel free to contact me with questions or comments. —Mattisse (Talk) 20:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): Well written
b (MoS): The article lacks lead section and does not follow MoS layout. 
- a (prose): Well written
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): The material under Grammy Awards is not referenced. b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR
- a (references): The material under Grammy Awards is not referenced.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): Gives a general overview b (focused): Does not provide sufficient detail on the development and production; lacks important sections such as one critical reviews as suggested by Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums. Please see It's About Time (Christina Milian album) for an example of a GA album article.
- a (major aspects): Gives a general overview
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias: NPOV
- Fair representation without bias: NPOV
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
This article is good as far as it goes. It needs to be fully developed with detailed information. Please see example given above as well as To the Stars (album) for ideas as to what qualities an article on an album for GA status. —Mattisse (Talk) 20:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)