Talk:Futurama/GA1
GA Reassessment[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Lots of unreferenced claims; there are several cn tags and three refimprove tags in sections along with some unreferenced content that has not been addressed yet, falls under immediate failures. In addition, some text may be a bit ambiguous for some readers to understand.Qxukhgiels (talk) 19:13, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Qxukhgiels how much time do you plan on giving before deciding to delist/keep this as GA? Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:51, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- A few weeks, at least. It's already been around for over two weeks with no opinions, so we need to get some opinions and give time for users to improve the article if they wish to do so.Qxukhgiels (talk) 21:16, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Given how this an individual assessment that you started, it will ultimately be your call as to whether it should be kept or delisted as GA. Personally, I would delist it due to lack of effort to improve the article and the concerns you raised when starting the reassessment. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:18, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- A few weeks, at least. It's already been around for over two weeks with no opinions, so we need to get some opinions and give time for users to improve the article if they wish to do so.Qxukhgiels (talk) 21:16, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delisted- I have reassessed as C class. If anyone disagreees, please discuss on the talk page.Qxukhgiels (talk) 00:41, 19 September 2014 (UTC)