Talk:Gigi l'amoroso

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Pop music

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article update required[edit]

@Lethiernois:

Hello,

you recently deleted my contribution to this article. You are aware that already the main article of the singer is the subject of a banner indicating non-neutrality, not to mention the mass of false information disclosed.

The information you put back to the publication shows Gigi l'amoroso n°1 in Luxembourg, as well as in Flanders and Wallonia (according to this source I presume). And at the same time, the official rankings indicate that the song was only 4th in Wallonia, and no official ranking is available for Luxembourg, as the old publication suggests. I think it would be good to differentiate between marketing and communication techniques from the reality of things. Also, you removed the famous leaked chart at the time indicating where the song would have been #1. These famous 9 countries. I brought a sourced explanation. Because being encyclopaedic means being factual and not pulling information off the cuff. You deleted the certifications received by the singer? Why ? The number of record sales achieved?

I'm going to put the article back to the way it was before and add the year-end rankings. --Elenora.C (talk) 11:04, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]