Talk:Glorious Results of a Misspent Youth

Fair use rationale for Image:Glorious Results.jpg

Image:Glorious Results.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge Lewismaster (talk) 10:32, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that I Need Someone be merged into Glorious Results of a Misspent Youth. I think that the content in the I Need Someone article can easily be explained in the context of Glorious Results of a Misspent Youth, being two editions of the same album. The Glorious Results of a Misspent Youth article is of a reasonable size that the merging of I Need Someone will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Lewismaster (talk) 12:49, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.