Talk:Good Spirit

Australia: Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal Good Spirit is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Good Spirit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20041001042132/http://www.undercover.com.au:80/reviews/urxavierruddsolace.html to http://www.undercover.com.au/reviews/urxavierruddsolace.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:49, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Good Spirit/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Start class:

Y A reasonably complete infobox
Y A lead section giving an overview of the album
Y A track listing
Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient) but note only Xavier Rudd is mentioned but no indication of instrumentation for this album.
Y Categorisation at least by artist and year

C class:

Y All the start class criteria
Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
N At least one other section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
N A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
N A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians. (I don't know if there were any)
N Independent in-line references supporting major/controversial claims. (e.g. Gold album status must be verified by ARIA or equivalent)

B class:

N All the C class criteria
Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
N A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
N No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 06:23, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 06:23, 17 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 16:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)