Talk:Got Mercury?

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wrong slate![edit]

The wrong slate is linked in the article. I dont know how to fix.

NPOV issue with press section[edit]

The press section of the article seems heavily biased against the report this group issued. Surely there must be people outside the group have defended the report? --Cab88 (talk) 15:06, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it looks like most of the wording of that section was taken from a press release from the National Fisheries Institute, certainly not an unbiased source. The paragraph about the New York Times story is largely irrelevant. Got Mercury's 17-page report includes 2 sentences about the New York Times story. And despite our misleading wording, their report doesn't "use" the New York Times story, it simply cites it as an example. The report is based on research done by the Turtle Island Restoration Network, not the New York Times. Kaldari (talk) 22:36, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've rewritten the section to be more NPOV. Kaldari (talk) 23:11, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Got Mercury?. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]