Talk:Gross production average

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Older than Gleeman[edit]

This stat has been around longer than Gleeman. Multiplying OBP by a number between 1.4 and 2 has been done for years. Its never been popular because once you introduce this fudge factor, you lose the simplicity of OPS... and you might as well go all out and use a comprehensive metric like RC or linear weights. Gleeman actually cites Tom Tango ("TangoTiger") is his blog entry about GPA as where he got his idea. DavidRF (talk) 07:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gross Production Average. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:34, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]