Talk:Hadrosaur diet

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge from AFD[edit]

This page is a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008–2009 hadrosaur chewing study. As of right now, it relies heavily on the info that was already available, and much more needs to be written about the various other theories and schools of thought. An excellent list of sources was created here, and moving forward we really need to incorporate those into the article. — Hunter Kahn _(c) 14:38, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am starting work on this; feel free to rework my additions as needed. Also, I am absolutely certain that J. Spencer will work on this article, as ornithopods are his specialty. As the man has worked on more than a dozen Featured Articles, many about ornithopods (see Thescelosaurus, Edmontosaurus, Iguanodon, Parasaurolophus, Lambeosaurus) I believe he'll have some unique insights that will help in balancing this already very good article. Firsfron of Ronchester 17:47, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I meant this message more for the people who might not have been familiar with the AFD discussion. I don't agree at all with the outcome, but I do believe most of the people who argued for it are intelligent people working for the betterment of Wikipedia, and I also believe a Hadrosaur diet article was certainly in order, so I'm sure this will be a great entry in short order. — Hunter Kahn _(c) 00:43, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So, someone here was flashing the Ornithopod-signal?

I'm not entirely certain how best to structure this so that it isn't an essay, but the historical part is reasonably cut and dried (partially copied from AFD discussion): Edward Drinker Cope's interpretation of an Anatotitan to show that hadrosaurids were water-plant gummers; the discovery of "mummies" that included fragments of plants in their guts; several landmark studies of hadrosaurs (Lull and Wright 1942, Ostrom 1964, Weishampel 1984); the summation in Bakker's The Dinosaur Heresies (probably the most influential to modern popular conceptions); and the present, where we've got studies from the back end of the dinosaurs (Karen Chin on probable Maiasaura coprolites with evidence for feeding on rotted wood), from the middle of the dinosaurs (Tweet et al on Brachylophosaurus), to the business end (computer modeling saying the upper jaws were immobile, and now this microwear study saying that they were). I'm probably missing something, but that's the general history (I know Galton's work on cheeks fits in as well). It's good to start off with an anatomical section; we'll need some diagrams as well. Marsh's "Claosaurus" annectens is probably the best on this front for the moment. J. Spencer (talk) 03:09, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can almost see you rubbing your hands in anticipation... ;) Hey, I know this is a long shot, but do you happen to have a PDF of Tweet et al.'s paper? Firsfron of Ronchester 03:49, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do, as a matter of fact. I've got the new chewing article as well, which I've been meaning to add to the references. J. Spencer (talk) 02:11, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I changed some of the mentions of Purnell to Williams, as Williams was the lead author on the journal publication (Williams, Barrett, and Purnell). Purnell appears to be handling the public contact. J. Spencer (talk) 02:31, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hadrosaur diet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]