Talk:Hannah Marks

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hannah Marks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723135012/http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2009/12/15/the-runaways-to-be-released-march-19th.html to http://www.getthebigpicture.net/blog/2009/12/15/the-runaways-to-be-released-march-19th.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CBI and birth date[edit]

The WP:BLPPRIMARY policy says "Do not use public records that include personal details, such as date of birth, home value, traffic citations, vehicle registrations, and home or business addresses". Personal information such as full name and DOB drawn from public records, such as those published at the California Birth Index, are regularly removed and revision deleted under this policy, because it is almost never possible to verify that the public record is the subject of the article without secondary confirmation (and if you can, then you don't need the public records, see also WP:DOB). Tenebrae, what is your proof that the public record you are using verifiably identifies the subject of the BLP? Indignant Flamingo (talk) 03:32, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In the spirit of collaboration, I offer [1] as an actual secondary source for the subject's birthday. Indignant Flamingo (talk) 03:49, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Indignant Flamingo. That works — and thanks, too, for knowing that Cleveland.com is The Plain Dealer!

I would just say again that the California Birth Index is, factually, not a primary source. It's an abstract taken from primary-source records, and so by definition a secondary source. I agree we have to make sure the individual identified is the article subject, which in this case comes from her independently verified place of birth and mother's maiden name. But all good! With best wishes, --Tenebrae (talk) 18:58, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]