Talk:Herne Hill railway station/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Chip123456 (talk · contribs) 19:10, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

not all paragraphs are backed up by references
most points are backed up
it is written in a neutral way

To provide a second opinion, I agree that the article is not well-referenced currently. I'll give it five days for there to at least be one ref in each paragraph. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:48, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

--Chip123456 (talk) 09:30, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article has been changed to on hold to rectify the above issues. --Chip123456 (talk) 11:27, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will then make a decision based on the changes that are made whether it passes or fails. The decision will be made on the 13th of April 2012 or when the problems have been rectified. --Chip123456 (talk) 17:47, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Chip and Wizard for looking over the article; I have added about 15 new references to the article to support the Description and History sections. Please have a look and let me know what you think. Tommy20000 (talk) 18:11, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will re check it now. Thank you for informing me. --Chip123456 (talk) 19:20, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have just checked it and I see now that most paragraphs are indeed backed up. However, there is no reference supporting transport links, so the article will still remain on hold until a reference is found for this. Well done on your other reference adding though, it is most pleasing to see editors like you, Tommy who are so dedicated to improving articles. --Chip123456 (talk) 19:26, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Chip. I've now added a reference for the transport links - a pdf of local bus routes with nearby rail stations marked on it.Tommy20000 (talk) 20:04, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am now, quite satisfied on how the article is. What I would like to do is decide whether is will pass or fail tomorrow. This will give other editors a chance to voice their opinions on the article, to see whether any other things can be done to improve it. I do have to say though at the moment it is looking very good. Chip123456 (talk) 20:45, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above is to ensure I haven't missed anything out. --Chip123456 (talk) 21:02, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]