Talk:Holmegaard bow
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Efficiency[edit]
The first paragraph, as currently worded, is self-contradictory. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable could explain how "the Holmegaard bow can often shoot an arrow faster and farther", despite being "not as efficient as a recurved composite bow".
I'm sure there is a distinction there, but it isn't clear to me how to explain it. --Wcoole (talk) 02:30, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Holmegaard bow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726052223/http://www.fiarc.org/public/Forum/Data/jeval/2005102714414_Tillering%20the%20Holmegaard%20Bow-2.pdf to http://www.fiarc.org/public/Forum/Data/jeval/2005102714414_Tillering%20the%20Holmegaard%20Bow-2.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:47, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Please analyze this IP user's single edit which I have undone.[edit]
On the above diff page, hit next to see my edit summary, which you might find relevant. Sorry this is all I can do, and today, barely this! —Geekdiva (talk) 14:16, 20 January 2019 (UTC)