Talk:Hugh Bardulf

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Derbyshire Mid‑importance

The article on Hugh Bardulf is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia.DerbyshireWikipedia:WikiProject DerbyshireTemplate:WikiProject DerbyshireDerbyshire articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article needs at least one photograph to be added
	This article has an infobox

Hugh Bardulf has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 13, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 25, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Hugh Bardulf is one of the few justices mentioned by name in the Tractatus of Glanvill, an early medieval English legal text?

Sheriff[edit]

I think he was High Sheriff of Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire and the Royal Forests as Derbys and Notts didnt have seperate sheriffs (I think) until 15C. Victuallers (talk) 15:33, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Ealdgyth - Talk 18:43, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hugh Bardulf/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: hamiltonstone (talk) 03:50, 13 August 2010 (UTC) As usual, this article is neutral, stable, well written and referenced. Specific comments:[reply]

Under early life: "Hugh acquired land at Waddington,..." which Hugh? The father I assume - isn't the 1140s a little early to be acquiring land for someone who dies c. 1203?
- No, it's the younger, according to Keats-Rohan. He was a elderly man when he died, and if he acquired the land as a teenager (or possibly younger) it's easily believable. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:23, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"Bardulf was a royal justice almost annually". This passage may be too hard to explain more fully, but I thought I'd mention that my reaction to this was along the lines of 'huh? aren't judges are appointed permanently?'. That left me unsure what a royal justice was.
- At this time, justices weren't appointed for life. They were sent out on rounds and each time a group was sent out ... the appointments were made again, and might or might not include those appointed before. I think Ironholds is planning on writing an article on royal justices in this time frame, and he's much better suited to the intricacies of the situation. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:23, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"along with the Philip of Poitou..." - is that a surplus "the"?
- fixed. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:23, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"when Bardulf was known to be dead" - I know what is meant, but it's an odd turn of phrase - any chance of expanding it slightly to something like "when records show Bardulf had died", or something? Not sure myself.
- Changed to "when records show that Bardulf was known to be deceased." Ealdgyth - Talk 13:23, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"He remained on such good terms with Hubert Walter, that when Walter..." and thereafter: I just didn't follow this. Maybe I wasn't reading the article carefully enough to that point, but this passage didn't make sense. To clarify: the written text is grammatically clear, I just didn't get the point. Why would one need to be on especially good terms, or why was this remarkable?
- It's one of those "bon mots" that's known in the medieval history field, a phrase that's memorable. I've expanded a bit, and hopefully it is clearer that it was Bardulf teasing Walter. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:23, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise excellent. Will keep an eye out. hamiltonstone (talk) 03:50, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ealdgyth, all good. hamiltonstone (talk) 22:37, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]