Talk:Hughes Helicopters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Toolco Helicopters[edit]

"Hughes Tool Co.: Aircraft Division" is listed on the identiplates (identification plates) of the U.S. Army OH-6 helicopters that were produced between 1966-1968. In 1976, the division was spun off as its own company to facilitate the AH-64 contract. I'll be looking to relocate my references to verify this information. --Born2flie 18:53, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Notability"[edit]

This article has existed for almost 2 years. In the last 3 weeks, I have made significant additions to this article, and plan to do more as I can in the near future. While it currently cites no sources, I am looking for some to cite. However, as an aviation enthusiast, I have read about Hughes Helicopters for years, and nothing here seems out-of-the-ordinary or non-factual.

As for its "notability", it was founded by Howard Hughes! How more notable can you get? It's not like this is a fly-by-night company that was around for only a few years, and only made one protoype. The company's history and accomplishments are in the article; I'm not going to repeat them here or anywhere else.

If you feel there are areas the article needs improvement to become "notable", then list them here, and I will be glad to address them here. There was obviously a reason the tag was added, but I can't guess what it was by reading generic articles in the tag, and I'm not going to try to prove something without knowing what the problem is. Is is not notable only because it hasn't cited sources? You just added the tag today, so when have we had time to address the problem? - BillCJ 07:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The link to policy (which wasn't right in the edit summary) is WP:CORP. That page says:
A company or corporation is notable if it meets any of the following criteria:
  • The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company or corporation itself.
  • The company or corporation is listed on ranking indices of important companies produced by well-known and independent publications.
  • The company's or corporation's share price is used to calculate stock market indices.4 Being used to calculate an index that simply comprises the entire market is excluded.
Hughes Helicopters satisifies the first criterion easily, not just borderline or close. Being a defunct company it doesn't satisfy the second, but would if it was an active corporation. The third is not really relevant - under Hughes/Summa Corp. ownership it was always private. A case could be made for merging it with MD Helicopters I think, but deleting for non-notabilty? That was either a misunderstanding of the significance of the company or, I'm sorry to say, less than constructive behaviour. Mark83 13:56, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hughes Helicopters/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==Start== Born2flie: Needs to fill out information about the company. --21:59, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 21:59, 31 December 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 18:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hughes Helicopters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hughes Helicopters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:41, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]