Talk:Humanistic sociology

Sociology High‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Otheus, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 11 February 2007.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Humanistic Sociology[edit]

I have taken three semesters of Humanistic Sociology so in no way am I an expert but I definitely fall into the class of devoted follower. Humanistic Sociology is central to my work as an educator. I would very much like to see this article fixed and expanded.

the positivisim error and philosophical balance[edit]

It is quite wrong to equate Humanistic sociology with positivisim and postmodernisim. The previous article completely contradicted the Antipositivism article. This is the main reason why I have rewritten it. This page now agrees with Antipositivism page description of Humanistic Sociology.

Historical development[edit]

It needs a historical context with the tragic history of Poland in the 20th century. We need to acknowledge the major intellectual contribution of the Polish thinkers such as Zaniecki, Ossowski and Ingarden

Schools of Humanistic Sociology[edit]

It needs a description of the results of the major humanist sociologists Zaniecki, Ossowski ect...

Results of Humanistic Sociology[edit]

It needs a summary of the results of this domain of Sociology, like the dynamics of the interactions of value-systems and how not to confuse Humanistic Sociology with subjects like cultural theory.

Academic Legacy[edit]

The importance of the major domains such as Tradition, Values and Culture and how they have influenced other important domains outside of sociology such as psychology, education and not least political science. Please add contributions

Postmodernisim[edit]

This article is not a diatribe against Postmodernism. I have pointed to the difference, I have not labelled postmodernism as unscientific, like many others. It is important to avoid ontological extremes.

Nigel Savage 09:10, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello to anyone who edit's this page. One centeral point i would like to preserve is the fact that "Znaniecki's model was derived independently of Max Weber and Emile Durkheim" hence it is an important alternative model to the standard academic models found in the so called "west" Nigel Savage 03:08, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This Article Needs Major Help[edit]

Its unclear to me what the connection is between humanistic sociology and most of the content in this article. I'm sure there is a way to connect structuralism, functionalism, etc. to humanistic sociology but that hasn't really been done here. RedHouse18 14:09, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

This Article Needs Major Help Note[edit]

Redhouse humanistic sociology started symbiotically in the States and Poland at the turn of the last century, since then it has stayed relevant (note the socio's group tag as High importance), this is its connection to all the major schools of sociology since that time. One importance is that it allows a perspective on the two competing paradigms of functionalism and structuralism and there many offshoots. That is to say and I believe it is true that humanistic sociology is apart from these schools thus allowing a unbiased critique (that is to say that a functionalist might disagree with a structuralist analysis and who is to say this disagreement is not a result of inherent bias such as capitalisms distrust of the concept of class structures or the Soviets horror of a bourgeoisie artists production of cultural capital). Also as I try to point out there is a thread of sociology somewhat independent of the functionalist/structuralist dichotomy leading from phenomenology to ethnomethedology most notably in Bordieu’s work. Humanistic sociology is as relevant today as it was over 100 years ago and to all the major developments along the way. Any way I have tried to answer what I believe is a very good question of yours cheers58.167.42.253 09:59, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Humanistic sociology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:03, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]