Talk:In re The Bible Speaks

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 September 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brainwashing[edit]

Undue Influence is not equivalent to Brainwashing. Wikipedia has a very nice article on undue influence. If you read it, you will find that Brainwashing is very different. I will let someone else write the rest of this article.Spinkava (talk) 14:30, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are type of undo influence. While they are not equals there is undo influence that is brainwashing. My point is not to say that the undo influence on Betsy was the equevlant I am saying the type, the method was indeed brain washing. If you have trouble accepting that I would suggest looking up brain washing on the net and studying it for a few minutes. I would have trouble accepting that you are not intelligent enough to see that is what it was.

Also one must understand the difference between a legal term and psychological term. insane is not a psychological term, it is a legal term.

Brainwashing isn't a legal term. But if I explained that a person was insane and then said he was psychotic, a layman most likely could understand how so.

--Tryster (talk) 19:28, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]