Talk:Inhuman Rampage

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Album Cover[edit]

What is the album cover supposed to be exactly? A safe? A clock? --Jeff24 12:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Probably a bomb, since its a rampage —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.49.216.248 (talkcontribs) 2006-03-02 01:06:45

If you look to the left of the disc there are buttons like you would find on a CD player (play, pause etc). And since the thing covering the fire is circular I guess its meant to represent how 'intense' the music is...or something. This would also mean the counter is moving up from zero rather than counting down towards it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Radagast1983 (talkcontribs) 2006-04-17 13:04:12

if you look closely it looks like a WinAmp skin almost below the counter display there's a graphic EQ and above it shows the Kbps similarly to that of the winamp media player —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.208.142.49 (talkcontribs) 2007-07-15 19:42:33

Musical Properties?[edit]

This new album diverges from Sonic Firestorm and Valley of the Damned in some ways. Do you think it should have a section addressing this? Indy Aaron 17:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

autograph from tower records[edit]

i was lucky enough to receive one of the tower records autographed booklets. and i don't know if it should be noted, but they were shipped with the cd, but the autographed cd booklets were seperate, in a seperate case. i actually recieved 2 booklets (one not autographed, sealed inside the with the cd, and the other in a different cd case, autographed and sans-cd) ~~Patrick~~ 19:07, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Source for the "theme" statement[edit]

Do we have one? As far as I know the album isn't considered either a theme or a concept album. It seems the current statement is more one of opinion. --Jeff24 12:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like nothing but opinion to me. I've seen no statements from the band supporting this claim.--Radagast1983 15:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DFIR.jpg[edit]

Image:DFIR.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sales Numbers[edit]

The article is stating two values currently. Please someone can put a reference to the correct sales figure or both are going to be removed. Haxxiy (talk) 21:25, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uptade - according to roadrunner records DF page the numbers actually displayed (for me edited) are correct. If someone needs a source is there, and please add this to article soon as possible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Haxxiy (talkcontribs) 20:59, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Frederic Leclercq[edit]

Some guy keeps putting Frederic back into the Band personnel list. I've undone the updates. --EonMinator (talk) 03:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But who played bass on the album? Saemikneu (talk) 00:19, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Until the dates given in the time-line and here, it was really Adrian Lambert. Saemikneu (talk) 18:08, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Inhuman Rampage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Inhuman Rampage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:11, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]