Talk:Archives & Museum Informatics

Canada: Ontario / Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

coi: MuseumStaff[edit]

Please note: i am a partner in Archives & Museum Informatics.

Edits by an unknown user:user:Museumstaff10 in September 2010 attracted coi tags from user: Teapotgeorge on this and the Museums and the Web article. We have no knowledge of who Museumstaff10 is, and this person has no connection with Archives & Museum Informatics. I requested on Teapotgeorge's user page that the revisions please be reversed, and this has happened on one article but not the other. If there are no objections, we should revert them here as well. Thanks. --Jtrant (talk) 03:58, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]