Talk:Adam in Islam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Talk:Islamic views on Adam)
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Islam (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Book of Enoch?[edit]

Hi. This has the makings of a good article. I'm just a bit concerned about the inclusion of things such as that reference to the Book of Enoch - material that seems not to be connected to Islam. But I leave it in your hands. PiCo 07:58, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

I completely agree. CID!!! (Consider it done!) I made the adjustments. Cheers. --How's my editing so far? Call 1-800-2GOOD4U! 12:51, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Guys are we missing some information here. On one hand the tradition said that Adam was missguided by Satan and as a punishment he was send to earth, now my question is if Adam was in Heaven, how come Satan reached him in Heaven and missguided him? he supposed to be out of Heaven and no access to Adam.

This is actually one of the hotly debated issues amongst islamic scholar with the regards to Adam at eden.
  • This is probably the most famous view: Iblis, prior to this incident was living amongst the angels and was not regarded as having this devil nature.
  • Some say that Iblis (satan) has the ability to misguide from distance from distance.
  • Some even say that Adam's eden is on earth, and not the actual Heaven. This view is laregly marginalised and countered by Quranic verses that infer that Adan's even is Heave. --Djihed 19:18, 11 December 2006 (UTC)


Deleting the controversial Tabari section[edit]

The VAST MAJORITY of Muslims do not accept Tabari's hadith as authentic, ESPECIALLY due to the so called "satanic verses". I will then delete his section. It's like putting a fairytale section on the Christianity page. --71.102.116.218 (talk) 00:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Adam in the Qur'an[edit]

The problem should be obvious in that it's a complete quoting of nine long blocks of Qur'anic text, each prefaced with "Allah the Almighty says" and no secondary sources or even proper citation of the primary sources. I'm basically going to hide the section while I work on fixing it, as the whole thing is patently unencyclopedic. If I could get help with the following it would be extremely helpful;

  • Cleaning up the POV tone
  • Properly dealing with/citing the primary sources and trimming it down to an appropriate amount of quotation
  • Finding and citing reliable secondary sources on the subject.

I will, of course, also be working on this, but as I don't know personally of good secondary sources on this myself that's the thing I'll need the most help with. I encourage discussion on it here if anyone has any objection. Peter Deer (talk) 23:19, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi Peter! I placed Quranic references from a secondary source website, owned by University of Southern California, USA. It is a reliable source because it is a respected and trusted university where people share unambiguous thoughts or whatever. The section now looks short and to the point. Thanks! Farjad0322 (talk) 03:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

None of the sources provided prove that Islam views Adam as the first human being created. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.64.61.129 (talk) 22:24, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

References to Adam in the Qur'an[edit]

The story of Adam can be found in different verses of the Qur'an:

As well as: 2:117, 7:54, 23:12-22, 32:7-11

Merge with Main Article[edit]

There have been several other instances where figures relevant to multiple religious perspectives, particularly Prophets, have been successfully consolidated in their own main article (in this case that would be Adam) and considering how trimmed down this particular page has gotten I recommend that it be merged with the main article and this section be fleshed-out to accommodate. Peter Deer (talk) 18:35, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

This is where I reply again to ping everyone with this on their watchlist. I'm really trying not to step on any toes by doing this ("Be bold, Peter!" "Shut it, you.") Peter Deer (talk) 05:47, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Might as well. This one isn't too large. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 08:52, 17 April 2012 (UTC)