This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Currently this article is being vandalized by many editors. The controversy surrounding Javed Habib spitting on a woman's head has triggered this row of vandalism. Senior editors should keep a vigilant watch on this article for at least the next few weeks. Thank you Charvak157 (talk) 03:05, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
No explanation has been provided for this revert even after multiple discussions[1][2] so far. The edit added the template which claims that the person is not notable and that is beyond WP:DE. Other than that it removed "He later apologised for the act" and added back the misrepresentation that "He also claimed ‘This spit has life'" which is being presented as if he justified his act with that 'claim' when confronted. The objected edit also moves the controversy to the lead despite it has no effect on his career. Per WP:UNDUE and WP:NPOV this edit should be reverted. AnM2002 (talk) 05:44, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If there isn't an explanation provided in, say, a couple of days, I'll be granting this request. @AnM2002 and DMySon: courtesy pings. El_C 13:35, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As the original writer of that version, I also support the restoration. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 03:43, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
this revert is well referenced (controversy) information about the subject, that must not be deleted from the page. DMySon (talk) 07:44, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done. DMySon, you're really expected to offer more. Please be responsive / substantive. Your terse declarative reply above falls short. El_C 15:13, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done. DMySon, you're really expected to offer more. Please be responsive / substantive. Your terse declarative reply above falls short. El_C 15:13, 11 January 2022 (UTC)