Talk:John Lane Bell

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Philosophy: Philosophers / Logic / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Logic
	Contemporary philosophy

Source tag[edit]

I don't understand what is not properly sourced. All of his books are evidence that he is a real person, and has done all that is said he has done. Editors need to stop being unimaginative and unnecessarily pedantic.

Where did you obtain the information? That's what's you must provide in the form of references. This cannot be left for the reader to infer from a list of published works. Please read WP:RS, WP:V, and in particular WP:BLP: biographies must be sourced. Acroterion _(talk) 21:56, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I obtained this information from his biography, which is online. Furthermore, he is listed on the department webpage at the University of Western Ontario website, which also includes extensive information about his background. The handicap here, one must realise, is not specific to this instance, but is widespread in case of serious academics who are not celebrities. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.100.63.72 (talk) 21:21, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Per WP:ACADEMIC he meets the notability standard. I'm going to move the reference around and do some de-tagging. Acroterion _(talk) 21:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]