Talk:Joshua Stacher

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled][edit]

I'll try to fix up these links ASAP.Nonplus (talk) 02:45, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I plan on expanding the research and public views sections to make them broader and more balanced. Re: the section on the Muslim Brotherhood. This piece was republished widely and caused a bit of a stir and I'd like to at least have a sentence about the criticisms and responses. Nonplus (talk) 03:18, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

I'm going to go ahead and remove the notability template.

I think Wikipedia's notability criteria are a bit inadequate in this case because we're talking about someone who is a public intellectual and not just an academic. That said, the notability criteria for academics are themselves sufficient to establish notability in this case: "Criterion 7 may be satisfied ... if the person is frequently quoted in conventional media as an academic expert in a particular area. A small number of quotations, especially in local news media, is not unexpected for academics and so falls short of this mark."

The subject meets this criteria, having been regularly quoted by major media around the world including Foreign Policy [1], Agence Global [2], ABC News [3], MSNBC [4], Harper's Magazine [5], Reuters [6], Daily News Egypt [7], Kuwait Times [8], ABC Australia [9], IPS News [10], Al Arabiya [11], Christian Science Monitor [12], and by groups such as by Human Rights Watch [13], and the American Enterprise Institute [14], among others. There are also books, radio interviews, etc in which he is quoted or interviewed. Nonplus (talk) 03:18, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Self-published sources[edit]

I'll do the same with the self-published sources template, with the following rationale:

  • Reference 1 isn't self-published, it's from Kent State University's Department of Political Science.
  • References 2-3 are self-published, which is acceptable according to WP:SELFPUB: "Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves..."
  • References 4-7 aren't self-published, they're published by peer-reviewed journals and the New York Times. They're written by Joshua Stacher, but what he has written is after all the subject of the article. Nonplus (talk) 03:18, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Joshua Stacher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:56, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Joshua Stacher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]