Talk:Kagyu Samye Ling Monastery and Tibetan Centre

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tibet Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Scotland Mid‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Celebrity citations

Please provide a credible reference for the assertion that David Bowie and Leonard Cohen were 'students' at the centre. The reference supplied is a newspaper article which says they were frequent visitors but this needs credible citation as well. A newspaper article which merely repeats an assertion made to a copy journalist is not an adequate citation. Neither David Bowie nor Leonard Cohen's Wikipedia entries mention Samye Ling nor do internet searches support the assertion. If no sources are provided I suggest the reference be re-written to indicate that it is a commonly held belief amongst the members of the community that they were students. One could also hope for an explanation of why David Bowie and Leonard Cohen's alleged association with the community is considered notable. Indeed are these the only notable people to have studied at Samye Ling in its 40 + years? Rinpoche (talk) 20:07, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images

I've deleted the gallery and the host of superfluous images added to "Tourist Attraction". In general Wikipedia should not be used as an image depository. Wikimedia Commons should be used for that and there is a template already provided in "External Links" to direct the reader.

For Wikipedia policy on galleries see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Image_galleries : this gallery fails the rule-of-thumb test that they should not be inserted where they serve only to illustrate the article title.

Regarding the section "Tourist Attraction" it's absurd it provided more images than the article on Canterbury Cathedral provides for itself. As for the section itself it should only be inserted so long as it provides information about the centre as a Tourist Attraction (for example statistics demonstrating the contribution it make to Scottish tourism or perhaps the local economy). Presently it doesn't do that and the suspicion must be that the real intention is to advertise the centre. I suggest the section should be deleted if it is not adequately expanded. Rinpoche (talk) 12:11, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trungpa Rinpoche

I have added a brief comment about the circumstances in which Trungpa Rinpoche left sourced by his widow. No more than a brief comment is necessary in this article but it seems to me the episode deserves expansion, perhaps in a page dealing with exploitation of minors in religious communities in general.

Piya Tan has a useful and skilful essay Avoiding unwholesome teacher-pupil relationships referencing Trungpa and the Samye Ling abuse allegations and I've linked this into the ==Abuse allegations== section.Rinpoche (talk) 11:30, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That Trunpa Rinpoche and Akong Rinpoche quarreled is cited in the reference provided. That the Johnstone House trustees were also in conflict is hearsay known to me and may reasonably be surmised in the circumstances but I know of no published source. I don't really see the point of challenging the reference but I will remove it if it is challenged with a ^{[citation needed]} template. Meanwhile please don't remove it while I attempt to locate a source. Rinpoche (talk) 14:14, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please do provide a citation. I agree with your remarks about the "tourist " section - although I imagine it must have a relatively significant impact in an area with few other immediate competitors. I would take care in alleging "paedophile exploitation" even on a talk page unless you are very sure of your ground. I have heard stores about the Bowie connection. However it may be difficult to source as it pre-dates the internet era. Ben Mac Dui 20:05, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The difficulty is contacting the original trustees (I only know of one still living) and I suspect "their lips are sealed". But I do vaguely remember a published source which I'll try to get hold of. I've rephrased my remark about "paedophile exploitation". Diana Mukpo's memoir makes it clear that she was 15 years old when her relationship began and that she was (in her own words) "naive". I've linked the Google Books extract in the reference. I think it quite possible David Bowie and Leonard Cohen visited the centre but does that make them students? Is it notable or 'encyclopaedic'? In the context of an expanded section describing (for want of a better word) the 'hippy' days at Samye Ling possibly. Otherwise I frankly don't see the point and I certainly don't think it should stand without citation. Rinpoche (talk) 21:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a reference from Anne Bancroft's (the academic, not the film star) 1976 "Twentieth Century Mystics and Sages". Best I can do without inducing a potentially fatal apoplexy in some aging dharma luvvy or other of the time.Rinpoche (talk) 16:30, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth I tried searching for Samye Ling in the VisitScotland in-line link provided in the article. Not one of dozens of hits provided in fact returned a viable page ("object not found")! I think Ben MacDui makes a reasonable point is saying there are no competitors (but there are some - the Eskdalemuir weather observatory and the curious Davington link with James Hogg not to mention the idyllic scenery of course ...).Rinpoche (talk) 22:26, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Happily I've found a reference to a Scottish tartan desinged by Lama Yeshe Losal which I think is genuinely notable and I thought to rename the "Tourist Attraction" section to "Scottish sensibilty" and include this item. Unfortunately I can't upload the image provided by the Scottish Kilt Compnay on their website for copyright reasons but it should be a straightforward matter for one of the monks at the centre to scan their bit of tartan edging and upload it.Rinpoche (talk) 00:29, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Other remarks

The external link to The Scotsman is defunct. I'll search their site and see if I can restore. Otherwise I'll delete it. A description of the template for citing web resources can be found here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_web Rinpoche (talk) 09:55, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't locate on a search. I'll give it 90 days grace to restore but it looks as if it has been deleted from their server.Rinpoche (talk) 10:09, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In fact the Scotsman reference was essentially repeated twice and once as an external link. One of the reference links is still good (copyright?) and I've combined the two and deleted the defunct external link. The Scotsman reference by the way demonstrates the essentially unsatisfactory nature of newspaper references. John Lennon and Yoko Ono certainly never visited Samye Ling, that's just valley myth. Newspaper citations are valid for newsworthy items but they shouldn't really be used otherwise.Rinpoche (talk) 21:35, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

'Abuse Allegations'

Scottish JPs are not usually called 'magistrates' and sheriffs certainly aren't. Was the 2000 case heard in the District Court (which seems unlikely) or the Sheriff Court?Costesseyboy (talk) 15:22, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is there some public records that can be referenced?Billlion (talk) 19:14, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Continuity

A paragraph begins "For about the decade 1970 onwards these two and Akong Rinpoche together" yet there is no lead in reference as to who the two are as the previous paragraph ends with the exit of CT.

86.158.95.112 (talk) 16:19, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Kagyu Samye Ling Monastery and Tibetan Centre/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article has no references whatsoever, which is a concern. The article is only a "start", and needs expansion in all areas, but the lack of references was immediately noticeable. Lurker (said · done) 09:44, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 13:51, 14 June 2014 (UTC). Substituted at 20:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kagyu Samye Ling Monastery and Tibetan Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.samyeling.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:07, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]