Talk:Khalique Ibrahim Khalique

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Pakistan

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I had to replace the previous article because of two major problems:

Bad English: I don't want to patronize, but correct use of grammar and words is essential for anyone who is interested in writing. For more information, please consult the guidelines for editing and contributing to Wikipedia.

Incorrect Information: There were a number of inaccurate statements in the previous article. To start with Khalique Ibrahim Khalique was not a journalist. For god's sake, there is a difference between a writer and a journalist.

-- MA

--203.130.14.92 09:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this article has No References at all and there is a basic notability issue. Its of a rather dubious nature and standing, therefore. It should, in my view, be either very drastically pruned and reviewed and/or should be simply deleted. I wonder ? Khani100 (talk) 20:28, 26 September 2014 (UTC)Khani100[reply]