Talk:Khmer Front Party

Khmer Front Party is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.CambodiaWikipedia:WikiProject CambodiaTemplate:WikiProject CambodiaCambodia articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cambodia To-do:

Let us work in the best reference and presentation of archaeological sites of Cambodia beyond Angkor like Sambor Prei Kuk, Angkor Borei (Takeo), etc.

Should disambiguate Republican Party for Democracy and Renewal and generally try to link up social conscience with right-wing values.

I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts. But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972 at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine. http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG

Thankfull for this info. [Unsigned]

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled[edit]

User: Political dweeb here wants to let all Wikipedians know that the reply I gave on the talk page on the Khmer Loves Khmer Party discussion page is the same one that I apply here and that I'm creating these articles on these cambodian political parties because I like them and not because I want to play a trick. I hope this reply is understanding and suitable so i thee is anything else anyone thinks I could do to suitably improve the articles I've made on the cambodian political parties or anything else then let me know and I will see what I an do. Political Dweeb (talk)

Hiya! I think this article looks like it's off to a good start. But I've noted one problem. Two parts of the page (which I have marked, for your ease of reference) employ "weasel words", phrasing that obfuscates opinion or theory as fact. In essence, weasel words are ways of reformatting "I think" into something more apparently authoritative. My guess is that the provided references DO corroborate the actual facts asserted (I confess to not having looked very closely), but that the conclusions drawn from these facts are your personal theories. That's not inherently bad in of itself, and you may well be right. But as per WP:SYNTH, making unsourced syntheses of published material still qualifies as original research. While you can leave the actual cited facts alone, I'd remove the claims made with the weasel terms. Unless, of course, the specific "seems to be" claims are made on the referenced pages themselves, in which case I am full of crud and should be ignored, and extend my apologies. - Vianello (talk) 16:59, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Khmer Front Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071023203706/http://www.camnet.com.kh/cambodia.daily/story_month/March-10-07.htm to http://www.camnet.com.kh/cambodia.daily/story_month/March-10-07.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:46, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]