Talk:Lady Mabel Fitzwilliam

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Lady Mabel Fitzwilliam is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 2007-06-12, see discussion.
Keep, 2007-03-04, see discussion.

Untitled[edit]

She was a Socialist, perhaps this makes her notable, given her position.--Couter-revolutionary 12:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no!--Vintagekits 12:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes.--Counter-revolutionary 10:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, actualy a noblewoman is a term used for a woman of noble rank, a peer, as according to the article she was only a councillor then the discription dosent apply in this case.--padraig3uk 10:03, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lady is a title of nobility. Add to that she had a position in the Order of Precedence = she was a noblewoman. Astrotrain 12:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article title[edit]

Will User:Vintagekits please read Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles), Other non-royal names, article 6; "Courtesy titles (also referred to as an honorific prefix)² such as Lord or Lady differ from full titles because unlike full titles they are included as part of the personal name, often from birth. As such, they should be included in the article title if a person if universally recognised with it and their name is unrecognisable without it. For example, the late nineteenth century British politician Lord Frederick Cavendish was always known by that form of name, never simply Frederick Cavendish. Using the latter form would produce a name that would be unrecognisable to anyone searching for a page on Cavendish. Similarly, Lady Gregory, the Irish playwright, is more recognisable to readers than Augusta Gregory. ". I believe that Lady Mabel is always as Lady Mabel Fitzwilliam/Smith. Taking this is away is completly unnecessary and certainly not inline with MoS like User:Vintagekits is suggesting with his usual POV. --Berks105 13:56, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the MOS and its provisions - however, this is not one of the exceptions and she is not "universally recognised with it and their name is unrecognisable without it". --Vintagekits 14:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's face it, Lady Mabel isn't that well known. The people that do know her will know her as Lady. --Berks105 14:02, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you have just argued against her point. 1. if she isnt well know as LMF then the article shouldnt be called it. 2. If she if that unknown maybe i should AfD it again! --Vintagekits 14:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. Many people on Wikipedia are not well known. 90% of MPs are unknown to the general public, especially former MPs, but they still deserve articles. And the people that have heard of Lady Mabel will call her that, no one will known her as Mabel Fitzwilliam/Smith. --Berks105 14:09, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"who was a pioneer in education and social welfare"[edit]

This is an exceptional claim - why or how was she a pioneer if these fields? Additonals as it is an exceptional claim it needs to be attributed as she is not (from my searches) known as this by any main stream sources, therefore I added a ^[who?] tag - but these were removed without the attribution being made. I know its referenced but as it is not a generally accepted fact it needs to be attributed. If it is not attributed then I am going to remove the claim.--Vintagekits 14:22, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

Why is this person notable?--Vintagekits 13:34, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

She isn't, she was a town counciller, nothing else.--padraig3uk 22:09, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

She was the daughter of Viscount Milton. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.33.36 (talk) 23:35, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lady Mabel Fitzwilliam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070208111119/http://www.1914-1918.net/women.htm to http://www.1914-1918.net/women.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]