Talk:Lahinch

Untitled[edit]

Lahinch is cool.

   ````kolef88  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.127.181.74 (talk) 21:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Panorama View[edit]

can i add this link in the external links http://www.360eire.com/360eire/Mumhan/ContaeanChlair/lahinch/anleacht.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dialinn (talk • contribs) 12:46, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Improve the surf sport paragraph[edit]

The surf paragraph is very limiting and mentions strong currents, although from experience Lahinch is a very safe beach to learn to surf. This needs to be improved and I would welcome any suggestions. --Lukemcurley (talk) 01:56, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As improvement, I have reverted your promo-story. Wikipedia is neutral at all times. The Banner talk 03:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am adding the photos section again, currently the photos provided are poor and this adds additional information about Lahinch and all photos are unbiased. I am going to rewrite the surfing article, currently it contains information on weever fish with no citation and a line that the currents are dangerous but no citation or reference. I would go as far and say this is a negative article about surfing at Lahinch. The piece is also poorly written, I think it is factual that it is a surf school beach but I will try to be more neutral with the writing and cite where needed --Lukemcurley (talk) 01:31, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures are not for decoration, so I have removed the four irrelevant pictures. The Banner talk 01:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for edit and not just reverting. Photos are useful, there was a photo of the tide out - this supports the article that it is a sandy beach, there was a photo that supported the article on sporting activities on the beach. There is benefit in having photos within Wikipedia articles, especially if they support the text in the article.--Lukemcurley (talk) 02:10, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It would also be useful to see a picture of the town itself or a local landmark besides the beach. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 12:04, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, a photo of the main street in the town would be a useful addition and maybe a photo of the Lifeguard Station as it was nominated for the LAMA Awards in 2011 (although didn't win).--Lukemcurley (talk) 13:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lahinch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927121458/http://timesonline.typepad.com/surf_nation/2006/06/lahinch_surfing.html to http://timesonline.typepad.com/surf_nation/2006/06/lahinch_surfing.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:44, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lahinch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222041138/http://www.stanneslinksgolf.com/mysitecaddy/site3/aboutskerritt.htm to http://www.stanneslinksgolf.com/mysitecaddy/site3/aboutskerritt.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.blather.net/theblather/2004/01/the_sunken_towns_of_ireland/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Declangi (talk) 00:06, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the removal. The Banner talk 10:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]