Talk:Laawaris (1981 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as High-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Laawaris (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131014090332/http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=125&catName=MTk4MC0xOTg5 to http://boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=125&catName=MTk4MC0xOTg5

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:12, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 30 January 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 18:40, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Laawaris (1981 film) → Laawaris
Laawaris → Laawaris (disambiguation)

– A simple Google Books search yields all the initial results to the more popular and rewarded 1981 film, clearly indicating that this is the primary topic and not the 1999 film. Oracle of Delhi 17:16, 30 January 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. — Amakuru (talk) 14:27, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Laawaris (1981 film) → Laawaris; put a hatnote there to Laawaris (1999 film); delete Laawaris (disambiguation). A disambiguation page is not required. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:45, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. In 2019, the 1981 film got 169 and the 1999 film 47 views/day (link). IMO that is not enough to declare a WP:TOPIC. 20% of readers would be directed to the wrong article. Narky Blert (talk) 11:51, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I understand your point @Narky Blert. But when those 20% of viewers will type Laawaris in the search box, won't both "Laawaris" and "Laawaris (1999 film)" be displayed? And isn't that enough to solve the issue in addition to hatnotes being already present? Oracle of Delhi 23:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Oracle of Delhi:. 100% of readers who type "Laawaris" into the search box will see those two targets. How are they supposed to know which is the one they're looking for? Our goal should be accuracy, not possibly saving one click.

Also, WP:PTOPICs inevitably collect bad links-in which hardly ever get found and fixed. (Links-in to Esplanade need checking from time to time to correct the ones intended for Esplanade, Kolkata. I've fixed over a hundred to that page; I may know two editors who have fixed more than that. You might also be surprised by the number of movies Krishna has allegedly acted in - not been portrayed in, but physically acted in. If that number is currently low or zero, I could guess which editor has made it so (and it wasn't me).) Narky Blert (talk) 00:32, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Narky Blert. Doug Mehus T·C 19:40, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The 1981 film dominated this pageview analysis. Colin Gerhard (talk) 15:23, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.