Talk:Lisa Bella Donna

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article removal[edit]

Remove this article!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1009:b068:2efc:30a1:d07e:3976:8e69 (talkcontribs)

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 17:59, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • In fairness, the article is entirely skewed towards one aspect of the subject, where half the article is basically "Early life and education" and little focus on her amazing career. Feels like WP:UNDUE to me - Alison talk 19:08, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Some sources about her career were removed because they either were or appeared to be dependent on press releases, and some were moved to the External links section, because they appear to be interviews without much secondary context or commentary. Based on a close review of sources, I also have concerns about how to balance the content in a WP:DUE manner. Beccaynr (talk) 19:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • An anon just removed some of the more intimate early life details from the first paragraph, which appear to be sourced to just one article. I kinda prefer it that way, as serious BLP statements require strong references, and they don't have that right now IMO. The reason I added the discography yesterday was an attempt to rebalance the article away from just the early-life stuff - Alison talk 19:30, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I had initially assessed the Columbus Monthly source as fairly strong, but as the article developed, particularly as balance issues emerged as sources were closely reviewed, I agree BLP and DUE support a limited approach to the Early life and education section. Beccaynr (talk) 19:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]