Talk:List of best Major League Baseball season win–loss records

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Criteria[edit]

The criteria of .700 and 120 games was selected in order to make a list that was neither too short or too long. Increase the games played # to 130 or 140 and you get even fewer teams. Lower the winning % to .667 and the list balloons to over 40 teams. Vidor 08:08, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone think that a section should be added showing the best records based on win totals? 76.252.29.31 (talk) 18:27, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That would be merely a subset of this list, right? Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 18:32, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, probably. I found a page on baseball-library.com which mentioned that only 8 or 9 teams have ever won 108 games in a year. Unfortunately, i can't find the page anymore, so i can't get a citation.76.252.29.31 (talk) 01:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
To handle the game count in a more gradual and robust way, an invariant measure should be sought out - such as the chi-squared statistic. Discussed under the chi-squared article is Lancaster's measure χ = (m - Np)/√(Npq) which, here, corresponds to p = ½ = q for a .500 record, over N games played and m wins. In a sport without ties (or where ties count as games no played, as they did in the NFL before the 1970's), that's equivalent to χ = (Wins - Losses)/√Games. With that measure you no longer need arbitrary "magic numbers" for cut-offs and can include all won-loss records irrespective of the number of games played. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.29.226.169 (talk) 01:59, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Move[edit]

This article needs to get moved. I don't think it's a question of *if*, but rather to where. First and foremost, the MLB abbreviation should be dropped in favor of the full name. That being said, here is what i suggest: "List of Major League Baseball team seasons with a winning percentage above .700". Thoughts??? While long, it is accurate and provides a more "finite" way of defining the goal of the article. //Tecmobowl 14:48, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Thy will be done, Oh Lord of Baseball. However, this article is a companion to the similar-named List of worst MLB season records. You need to come up with a uniform naming convention... or, possibly, combine the articles as a "Best and Worst..." Baseball Bugs 14:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of best Major League Baseball season win-loss records. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Major League Baseball which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]