Talk:List of proposed geoengineering schemes

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

keep, 23 November 2016, see discussion.
keep, 10 August 2012 (UTC), see discussion.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles

Environment

This environment-related redirect is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized.
Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles

Lists

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles

Mineral sequestration[edit]

Perhaps Andrew V. G. Chizmeshya can be mentioned; appearantly he invented something called "serpentine carbonation"; see http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/03/carbon-seq/PDFs/147.pdf , http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es0346375 91.182.164.152 (talk) 13:57, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Geoengineering lists[edit]

I think the Outline of geoengineering is quite good and quite readable. But I am concerned about some other lists in the area of geoengineering: List of proposed geoengineering schemes, List of geoengineering papers (part 1), and List of geoengineering papers (part 2). These three lists do not seem encyclopedic and I have tagged them accordingly. I thought it might be useful to centralise discussion of these lists, with a view to merging or deletion, at Talk:Outline of geoengineering#Geoengineering lists. Contributions welcome there. Johnfos (talk) 21:46, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of proposed geoengineering schemes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090308074725/http://www.californiaskywatch.com:80/documents/htmldocs/geoengineering.htm to http://www.californiaskywatch.com/documents/htmldocs/geoengineering.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:56, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into List of geoengineering topics[edit]

I propose to merge this page into List of geoengineering topics. The large majority (but not all) of the topics are actually schemes. Jesse L Reynolds (talk) 10:26, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]