Talk:Little Grill Collective

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 December 2023. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cooperatives (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Little Grill Collective. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suspicion of undisclosed paid editing[edit]

@Elli:, you removed the UPE maintenance template, however you did not provide any explanation why you believe the template is incorrect one or any reasonable justification supportingWP:WTRMT. The user Artaxerxes did not disclose their COI, yet their edit pattern at this article, related articles, as well as non-related articles are quite indicative of client involved public relations editing. Graywalls (talk) 07:05, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't given any actual evidence of paid editing and your conduct here has been to assume bad faith with regards to them not only having a COI, but being paid. Writing in a somewhat poor manner doesn't mean someone is paid. Elli (talk | contribs) 07:11, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Elli:, this is why the UPE template says "may have been", which is comparable to reasonable suspicion rather than "it has been proven that". Editing over the same article over a long period of time, editing pages directly related to over a long term along with the use of flimsy primary sources, introducing undue contents. If each item mentioned was a strand, it doesn't support the supposition, but these strands put together establishes reasonable suspicion of public relations editing. Graywalls (talk) 08:21, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]