Talk:Luther Russell
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Missing Compilation[edit]
Why don't you have this compilation in the discography? Leitmotiv (talk) 17:36, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Removal of PROD[edit]
The recent removal of the PROD stinks. First WP:GNG is a preliminary step in assessing notability. A competent editor then moves to a specialized set of guidelines for the article, which I did, with a brief explanation. The editor ought to have addressed those issues, rather than fall back on a generalized guideline. Any idiot or his mother who puts out a song gets mentioned in AllMusic. A brief mention in Billboard absolutely doesn't meet WP:MUS, let alone any of the other mentions. This nominal editor has forced an entry in WP:AfD. Thanks a lot! Tapered (talk) 02:33, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- WP:GNG is not the preliminary stage it is in most cases the only requirement, also most music articles that are prodded by experienced editors do not have significant coverage at Allmusic as well as Quitus, Pitchfork, Eagle Tribune which are all independent reliable sources. If it goes to AFD it will most likely to be kept as passing WP:GNG which is sufficient for musicians. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:05, 7 November 2018 (UTC)