Talk:Main Western railway line, New South Wales

Australia: New South Wales / Transport Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Main Western railway line, New South Wales is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Main Western Line.

Merger with Wallerawang Colliery

I didn't suggest the merger, but I would agree with it. There's just not enough information to write an entire article on the Colliery branch. JRG 12:27, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Complete List of Stations?

What about a complete list of stations on this line? Tabletop (talk) 03:01, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

this would be on the map, or check Rolfe's link for the line --Dave Rave (talk) 04:23, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Little zig zag

User:Dave Rave/sandbox1#Main West
(expand Penrith), redo the zig zag, does that look better enough to copy over ?
(expand Katoomba) update Clarence
(expand Lithgow) moved two to sub text and one to the next line and subtext so the line doesn't kick out at the bottom. Maybe some1 smarter could just fix it, but here's my suggestion. Good ? --Dave Rave (talk) 07:04, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lucasville, Breakfast Point

Pretty sure Lucasville should be marked as a turnback, like Lapstone Bottom Points, and Breakfast Point should be a regular station?

Not sure how to make the change though.

Anothersignalman (talk) 16:49, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Main Western railway line, New South Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070927214322/http://www.atse.org.au/uploads/Thornton.pdf to http://www.atse.org.au/uploads/Thornton.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:03, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

when ?

does Drover's edits of 2016 get to be addressed using wp:BRD or wiki edit warring or wiki other thingy or anything escalating her ignorance over the actual actuality ? Dave Rave (talk) 08:06, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, DR made an edit, DW reversed with a suggestion it be taken to the talk page. Per WP:BRD, onus was then on DR to initiate a discussion on the changes proposed, which was not done. For what its worth, agree with DW's reversal, DR's edit was an unnecessary change to some thing that was WP:NOTBROKEN. Einenho (talk) 03:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

this is not a broken redirect situation, it's "I don't understand your simple template that makes things easier to read update, I'll revert this on a page that I've never ever made an edit on because if I don't understand it, it must be silly" Dave Rave (talk) 20:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

nonsensical claim

The line to Walgett may have reduced the catchment of the Western Line to Bourke, somewhat, but the line to Brewarrina did not, because the line to Brewarrina was a feeder branch of the Western line.Lathamibird (talk) 15:46, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ah, that bit, it doesn't make much claim about which catchment area (river), but it might also be the rail lines catchment (goods) Dave Rave (talk) 09:14, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]