Talk:Maritime flag signalling

Note to editors[edit]

The initial version of this article could be considered a mere sketch of what could be covered; a serious expansion is not unwarranted. However, in order to avoid any deterioration of quality, I would ask subsequent editors to consider the following.

1) Please do not jump in just because you thought of something to add, or saw something interesting "on the web". Much of the material on this topic on the web is unsourced, unauthoritative (often amounting to little more than a blog of opinion), and sometimes even incorrect. If you have something to add, please base it on authorititative, perfereably original, sources (though views and opinions of recognized experts are also valuable). (Google Books ia a rich and very handy mine of old texts.) Proper research does take time (I have spent around a hundred hours on this article), but that is necessary to be authoritative, as opposed to just opinionated. Contact me if you need help.

2) Please do not add the NATO flags! The topic of naval (that is, of navies, not the merchant and other vessels) flag signals is immense, and warrants its own article, but that is not this article.

3) Please do not distort the coverage of this article. I covered Marryat, because his Code of Signals was the most widespread, most prominent system of signalling prior to the current International code. Other systems of signalling (such as Rodger's, widely used in American shipping) are of interest, but overall are not as significant. A section touching on all of these might be useful here, but if you want to cover just a single system I would advise doing a separate article, which can then be cross-linked.

Thank you. J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 20:31, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Maritime flag signalling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:55, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

French developments[edit]

@Spinningspark: Thanks for the bit about the French developments (we needed that). Holzmann & Pehrson looks to be excellent. Do note that we should use templates. If you look at my last two edits you can see how I templated both the full citation for Holzmann & Pehrson, and the short-cites. I converted the {{cite book}} templates to {{citation}} templates because the former (like most {cite xxx} templates) don't generate the necessary anchor by default. Also to be consistent with the existing use of {citation}, which displays slightly differently from {cite}. ♦ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 22:14, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]