Talk:Mark Pepys, 6th Earl of Cottenham

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 22:08, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(
)

Created by Moonraker (talk). Self-nominated at 04:06, 23 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • Hi Moonraker (talk), review follows: article created 22 December and exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to what look to be reliable sources for the subject matter; I found no issues with overly close paraphrasing in a spot check on the sources; hook fact is interesting, mentioned in article and checks out to source cited; a QPQ has been carried out. I added a little on his short career with the yeomanry. My only query is if you have a source for the list of his books? - Dumelow (talk) 14:05, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, Dumelow. This point has come up before, and the answer is that books cite themselves. See Template:Did you know nominations/Julian Moynahan. The dictum of Vanamonde is that “Books are acceptable sources for the content within them, and are therefore acceptable sources for their existence, when they have complete publication information.” She has suggested including ISBNs or OCLCs, but ISBNs do not seem to exist for any of these books. I have just searched and could only find two OCLCs, have added those. So we have the best info I could find. Moonraker (talk) 15:04, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Moonraker, fair enough. I'm sure I've seen it go the other way, but perhaps that was at FAC or somewhere - Dumelow (talk) 16:11, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"He did not support the war with Germany"[edit]

It would be interesting to know why. Ericoides (talk) 06:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ericoides, long time no see. I agree. I couldn’t find a precise date for the resignation. I suppose the most likely explanation is that when Operation Barbarossa was launched in June 1941, Cottenham took the view that the Soviets were a bigger threat to the world than Hitler’s Germany, so it was time for us to take a step back and sit it out. Stalin was an even bigger villain than Hitler, and far worse than Mussolini, and there were others who saw things that way. An interesting development at the time of the invasion of Russia was that there were British union leaders who stopped obstructing the war effort, as until then Germany had been an ally of the USSR. Another possibility is that it was something to do with the arrival of Rudolf Hess in Britain in May 1941, or with the Anna Wolkoff affair. I think I am going to get hold of the Bryan Clough book, which is not fully accessible online, and see what light he throws on it. Moonraker (talk) 13:08, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, a long time indeed, Moonraker! Thanks for the various theories. It will be good to see what Clough says. Ericoides (talk) 05:10, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I now have it, Ericoides, but it doesn't throw much light. I have added a note about a connection with Anna Wolkoff. As you will see, he went out with her and she wrote to him from prison, but he did not reply. Even if he was sympathetic, no doubt he saw the danger. Moonraker (talk) 17:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see, thanks. Makes me think of Remains of the Day reflected in a broken mirror. Ericoides (talk) 20:42, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mark_Pepys,_6th_Earl_of_Cottenham&oldid=1204583811"