Talk:Marriage Guidance Counsellor

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 June 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 March 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Monty Python task force.

Image copyright problem with Image:CarolCleveland.jpg[edit]

The image Image:CarolCleveland.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:49, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merging[edit]

Given the results of the article's recent AfD, would anyone object if I merged content to And Now for Something Completely Different, given that this appeared to be the most popular preference? ╟─Treasury Tag►sundries─╢ 20:13, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The article is fine as it is. Merging into that movie would tend to confuse and distort the topic as the sketch first appeared elsewhere. Warden (talk) 21:40, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
give over - haven't you done enough here? William M. Connolley (talk) 21:49, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I guess you didn't read the AfD closing statement then. But thanks for being disruptive. ╟─Treasury Tag►Syndic General─╢ 21:52, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't it time you gave up being bitter about this rather minor matter and moved on to something more productive? William M. Connolley (talk) 22:47, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've made a merge proposal, and if you don't have a comment to make on it, then you should stop editing this page. ╟─Treasury Tag►secretariat─╢ 08:18, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Take my advice, I'm not using it". Warden (talk) 08:28, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]