Talk:Martin/General Dynamics RB-57F Canberra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Query[edit]

Why is this article not merged into the general B-57 article?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:36, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was originally just a section in the main article, but when the section expanded to an article-length size, someone obviously split it off. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:43, 2 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Probably a good move, there is a lot of info here and it would be cluttered in the b-57 articleBeefcake6412 (talk) 22:16, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, it would be very difficult to merge this amount of detail back into the host article. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:27, 2 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]
The RF-B57F and D are basically different aircraft than the B-57 bomber is. Why I wrote these as separate articles. Bwmoll3 (talk) 23:19, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First shootdown?[edit]

From the S-75 Dvina article:

"the first aircraft actually shot down by the S-75 was a Taiwanese Martin RB-57D Canberra high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft. In this case, the aircraft was hit by a Chinese-operated S-75 site near Beijing on October 7, 1959."
Unsourced. Anyone know more? Andy Dingley (talk) 17:36, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You might want post this at Talk:Martin RB-57D Canberra too, since this page covers the F model. - BilCat (talk) 17:54, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, thanks - I'd been reading about the Black Sea -F loss and thought the Taiwanese one was a -F too. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:29, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Robert Jackson's Canberra: The Operational Record (Airlife, 1988) states that one of the three RB-57Ds operated by Taiwan was shot down by PRC fighters (apparently after pressurisation failure and descending to lower altitude), with the other two aircraft surviving to be retired due to fatigue problems in 1964.Nigel Ish (talk) 18:39, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Martin/General Dynamics RB-57F Canberra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:07, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Error in metric conversion?[edit]

In the last paragraph of "Testing and production", I see "Bulova 707-1000 long range camera, which had a 240-inch (608mm) focal length". 240 inches would be 6096 mm, which looks like just a mis-placed decimal point, but I don't know which number is correct. I don't have any sources other than other Wikipedia articles to verify this, so I can't edit this myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.115.49.175 (talk) 00:06, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Martin/General_Dynamics_RB-57F_Canberra&oldid=1203645607"