Talk:Naples Metro

Line 9 (Naples Metro) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 26 August 2014 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Naples Metro. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Trains: Rapid transit Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Metropolitana di Napoli or Metronapoli

The name of the article is Metropolitana di Napoli. But the official site is called Metronapoli. And the official site only covers line 1 & 6 (and the funiculars). What about the other lines - is it a separate system? And why are they included in this article? -- Kildor (talk) 16:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is because the company that operates the majority of the network is called Metronapoli, but the network is officially called Metropolitana di Napoli. Most Neapolitans just refer to it as the Metro, however. I am upgrading the article currently, and will create a seperate one for Metronapoli, which will hopefully clear up any confusion. Robert Fleming (talk) 14:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Napoli second largest city?

In the artikel it says that Napoli is Italy's second largest city. But would Milan not be Italy's second largest city? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.102.154.9 (talk) 23:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

di Metro?

Di Metro does not mean "the Metro." It means "of Metro." I am not disputing the nickname, but the translation is inaccurate.72.78.15.95 (talk) 21:50, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ridership

If there are 470,000 riders per day, then there are far more than 29,000,000 per year. Roughly 171,000,000. --142.162.11.14 (talk) 22:21, 8 November 2009 (UTC)8 November 2009[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Naples Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:51, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]