Talk:Murder of Catrine da Costa/Archive 1

Untitled[edit]

I've added the date when the court decision will be revealed. I also included the translations of the book titles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.209.139.84 (talk) 22:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete[edit]

As it stands, the article basically says that the "general practitioner" and the "pathologist" were convicted first of murder and then later of dismembering the body on the ("facilitated") testimony of a 2½-year-old whom they apparently let watch while committing a crime. That is hard to believe. So if there was (additional) evidence of their guilt, this should be added to this article (and probably highlighted :-)). If not (i. e., the 2½-year-old's testimony was indeed the sole reasoning, JFC), that should be clarified as well. --Tim Landscheidt (talk) 18:51, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And wouldn't the doctors' names be a matter of public record? Why is that information withheld here? - Boneyard90 (talk) 15:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In accordance with Swedish law and general handling of cases the names of the criminals are withheld. And especially in a case like this were the two men accused has not been imprisoned I can not see a reason as to why their names should be included. --BabbaQ (talk) 19:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Murder of Catrine da Costa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:45, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Murder of Catrine da Costa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]