Talk:2008 Nevada Democratic presidential caucuses

Opening heading

How about something discussing the lawsuit concerning that at-large precincts on the strip. I would like to see information about how the number of delegates for each precinct are calculated, since most MSM articles just say "a complicated formula is used" - I'd like to see the formula and an explanation of it.

24.7.24.18 (talk) 12:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added a quick blurb on the casino situation. Joshdboz (talk) 19:36, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pics?

I would suggest removing the pics of the candidates, considering no other state 2008 primary/caucus article have a list of pics, and they really just take up space. Joshdboz (talk) 20:02, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adding results

I'm sure all of us political junkies are following the events of the day, but it seems a little premature (potentially biased to favor one candidate?) if we're adding any numbers when 3% of the results are in and the margin is so close. Thompsontough (talk) 20:38, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What do the numbers mean?

Question about numbers: What exactly do the numbers in the Republican/Democrat Caucuses reflect (e.g. Romney 17582 with 32%, etc.)? Are these weighted in some capacity? I can't imagine Romney, with 32% of the vote in having more caucus votes than the entire Democratic field combined with 80% of the votes in? Forgive my ignorance. 74.138.220.149 (talk) 21:41, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Those are caucus delegates. IIRC, they are elected by popular vote, and then attend the caucuses and elect national delegates to the national convention. 65.31.80.94 (talk) 22:31, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Like in Iowa, the Nevada caucus counts are given in state delegate equivalents, which will undercount the vote of the lesser candidates (i.e. Edwards, Kucinich), because they don't meet the threshold in many precincts. The Republicans conduct a straw poll and delegates are all uncommitted, but allocated proportionally for media purposes. Thus, the Republicans report real persons. Calwatch (talk) 02:40, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Results

Who won? Currently, it is listed as Barack Obama, but the actual number will not be out until April. Shouldn't we put Clinton out first because she did win the popular vote and Obama's delegate count is only an assumption, not fact. Yialanliu (talk) 14:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand, the media assumption is more accurate for the Democrats, because all delegates sign a statement of support for their candidate (although they are legally unbound). Since the media is reporting it this way, I am going to stick with this. Calwatch (talk) 19:24, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to this no delegates were awarded. -- Kendrick7^talk 22:39, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Total Votes

How many total votes were there? I can't access this information anywhere. It's interesting to compare to how many voters came out during the Republican Primary. Does anyone have access to this information and why isn't it in the article? Popular vote is pretty important. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.210.196.138 (talk) 21:28, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nevada caucus 2008 Caesars Palace CNN.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Nevada caucus 2008 Caesars Palace CNN.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:07, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Nevada Democratic caucuses, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:53, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nevada Democratic caucuses, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080124100438/http://ruralvotes.com:80/thefield/?p=269 to http://ruralvotes.com/thefield/?p=269

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:35, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Nevada Democratic caucuses, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2008 Democrats Abroad primary which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 07:33, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]